Therefore翻譯社 there will be friends, said: "Guo Wengui exposed, the CCP's problems in the anti-corruption, but Guo Wengui is both the beneficiaries of the system翻譯社 but also the victim, his huge source of assets is not legal翻譯社 but Guo's own democratic And his character, whether it is a democracy or a knowledgeable elite, is hard to accept. "(See my eds." Collected sayings about the pro-democracy camp oppose Guo Wengui (31) ").
If Mao Zedong dispute is history, "White Deer" is a literary creation, then, recently occurred in our side翻譯社 Twitter on翻譯社 "turned his face" at the support of the three翻譯社 the so-called "three guarantees" (life insurance Money翻譯社 the family) of the "broke the news", is not a typical "chaos party" it?
Recently, Jiangsu TV in the TV drama "White Deer", I also see. I have a feeling: the Kuomintang翻譯社 are "chaos party". Not only the feudal cultural sense of the "chaos party", but also the democratic and cultural sense of the "chaos party." I wonder how do you feel?
Mao Jiang dispute翻譯社 in China for more than half a century. Today, is about culture, I want to remove the political factors to see: Mao Jiang翻譯社 is the same culture - Chinese style翻譯社 feudal party culture. Is not it
Chinese people to pursue democracy翻譯社 has been more than 100 years, and China has not been able to achieve one of the important reasons for democracy, I am afraid that cultural differences, or even out of tune.
Democracy翻譯社 is a culture, is a Western culture, is the Western-style party culture, rather than Confucius and Mencius feudal culture翻譯社 not the Chinese-style翻譯社 feudal society of party culture.
Maybe someone says no. No, yes, we do not dispute, there is no need to unify the point of view. Anyway翻譯社 "unity", the more is the Chinese culture翻譯社 rather than Western-style democracy.
In fact, the democratic culture can not accept, and why not Guo's literacy and character? "Fumbold King" of the literacy and character翻譯社 democratic culture can accept it?
Mao Jiang dispute翻譯社 in China for more than half a century. Today翻譯社 is about culture翻譯社 I want to remove the political factors to see: Mao Jiang, is the same culture - Chinese style, feudal party culture. Is not it?
I have always felt: Mao Jiang dispute翻譯社 just as Liu Bang and Xiang Yu dispute翻譯社 just like the dynasty dynasty change, non-kill a win or lose翻譯社 kill you die my life.
The past East Germany翻譯社 West Germany, now South Korea, North Korea翻譯社 are the result of Western culture. People翻譯社 we know that coexistence翻譯社 we do not understand.
Really. Therefore翻譯社 a large number of overseas democracy翻譯社 there is no support翻譯社 or position.
From the authoritarian point of view翻譯社 "broke the news" is undoubtedly chaos party. From the perspective of democratic culture, "broke the news" Is it not "chaos party"
Many people are thinking: predecessors called, struggle, waste private school, Xingxi ... ... However翻譯社 a hundred years, China翻譯社 why did not realize democracy? Cultural factors翻譯社 which may be one of the most important factors.
Mao also shouted "unity", Chiang also shouted "unity". What is "unity"? "Unity" is not uniform翻譯社 centralized?
Many people are thinking: predecessors called翻譯社 struggle, waste private school翻譯社 Xingxi ... ... However翻譯社 a hundred years, China, why did not realize democracy? Cultural factors翻譯社 which may be one of the most important factors.
Democracy, is a culture翻譯社 is a Western culture翻譯社 is the Western-style party culture翻譯社 rather than Confucius and Mencius feudal culture翻譯社 not the Chinese-style, feudal society of party culture.
留言列表